Accounting · Double entry and error correction
My trial balance does not balance. How do I find the error without redoing everything?
Do not start again. The difference itself tells you what kind of error you are looking for, and checking it in the right order usually finds the problem in a couple of minutes rather than an hour.
Work out the difference, then test it
Take the gap between your two totals and run it through four checks, in this order. Each one is faster than the last resort of re-adding everything.
Is the difference divisible by 9? Then you have probably transposed digits: written 540 as 450, or 1,290 as 1,920. Transposition errors always produce a difference that is a multiple of 9, which is a genuinely useful fact and one almost nobody is taught. Scan for two digits swapped.
Is the difference exactly the amount of a transaction you recognise? Then the entry has gone in on one side only. Find it and post the other half.
Is the difference exactly double a figure you recognise? Then the entry is on the wrong side. A 300 debit posted as a 300 credit throws the balance out by 600, not 300. This one catches people constantly, because they look for 600 and the error is a 300.
Is it a round number like 100 or 1,000? Then suspect an addition error in a column rather than a posting error.
The errors a trial balance will never find
This is the part that carries marks in the written questions, and it is worth knowing cold. A trial balance only proves that debits equal credits. It does not prove the entries are right. Six kinds of error survive it:
- Omission — the transaction was never entered at all, either side.
- Commission — right amount, right side, wrong account of the same type (rent paid posted to insurance).
- Principle — right amount, wrong type of account, typically capital expenditure posted as revenue expenditure.
- Original entry — the wrong figure entered, correctly, on both sides.
- Reversal — debit and credit the right amounts but swapped between accounts.
- Compensating — two separate errors that happen to cancel out.
A question asking "will this error be revealed by the trial balance?" is testing exactly this list, and the answer for all six is no.
If it still will not balance
Open a suspense account for the difference so you can carry on, then clear it as you find each error. That is what the suspense account is for, and questions often start you at that point: here is a suspense balance, here are the errors, correct them and show the suspense account closing to nil.
Work through those corrections as journal entries with a narrative, not as mental arithmetic. The journal forces you to name both sides, and naming both sides is what stops you fixing one error by introducing another.
Working from a past paper? Mark your attempt against the published mark scheme before reading an answer like this one. Finding out where you lost the marks is worth more than seeing a correct solution, because the correct solution rarely tells you what you did instead.
Related questions
Ordered by how close they are to this one: same topic first, then the same subject.
Accruals and prepayments: how do I know which way round the adjustment goes?
Stop trying to remember which is which. Work it out from one question, every time: has the expense been used up, and has it been paid for? Those two things come…
What is the actual difference between complete and incomplete combustion, and why does it matter?
One variable decides it: how much oxygen is available. Everything else, including the products, the flame colour and the danger, follows from that.
I name the technique and still lose marks. What does 'analyse the effect' actually want?
It wants the specific thing that this word does to this reader in this sentence. Naming the device identifies the tool. The marks are for what the tool was used to…
How do I work out concentration when the question gives me a mass and a volume?
Always through moles. Mass and volume never connect directly, and trying to make them is the single most common reason these questions go wrong.
How do I show a quadratic has two distinct roots without solving it?
Use the discriminant, and state the conclusion in the form the mark scheme wants. Most students get the arithmetic right here and lose the mark on the final line.
A 1200 kg car has a driving force of 4000 N and 1600 N of resistance. What is its acceleration?
2.0 m/s². The whole question is one idea: find the resultant force first, then apply F = ma. Most lost marks here come from skipping the first word.